andyd12345 12:49 Tue Jun 4
Lucas Perez gone
|
|
Signed for Alaves on a permanent deal. Undisclosed fee.
DG on Twitter.
Never looked quite good enough, but 6 goals in 19 appearances isn’t too shabby, especially as a vast majority were substitute appearances.
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Jasnik
8:40 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Sarge 3:05 Tue Jun 4
Yeah agree about Arnautović . but what about perez !.
|
-[Rasta]-
5:58 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
I am happy so far these are the sort of players we normally get stuck with, looking forward to what pellers comes up with being in total control of the transfers.
|
Takashi Miike
3:11 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
it's all about trimming the wage bill for the Dildo Bros
|
Sarge
3:05 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Never really took to him. bit too full of himself without ever really backing it up on the pitch.
Bit of a sulky selfish git off it too by all accounts.
Journeyman 3rd 4th choice striker at this level with his attitude
|
geoffpikey
2:01 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
WHO?
|
zebthecat
1:44 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Oh well.
He'll not be missed.
|
cholo
1:41 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
I'm shocked and disappointed we haven't signed Cristiano Ronaldo and if we had signed him, he's too old and on too much money, what were we thinking?
|
Mr Anon
1:34 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
are people really complaining already? Jesus
|
Lee Trundle
12:06 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
I'd imagine the supposed £80k a week he was on could go pretty far?
|
On The Ball
12:04 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Why is it a shite start to the window?
|
BennyJay
12:02 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Sh*te start to the window. Treating it like its season 2006/07 transfers. Don't care about Perez but 2mln here isn't going to go far. 40 mln kitty is literally ONE half decent player now.
|
On The Ball
10:54 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
You say that Boycie, but he clearly had a knack for getting the ball in the net. He was a really poor player, but I'm not sure a yoot would have scored the number of goals he did.
|
Boycie
10:52 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Mad Dog 10:09 Tue Jun 4
precisely good riddance to bad rubbish as my old Nan used to say. Could have used a development player from the Juniors for all the good he was.
|
wanstead_hammer
10:52 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Adios!
Thought he was a load of shit tbh.
Liked to look the part, but was clueless on the pitch. Think a couple of his goals were deflections and one against mighty Macclesfield?
|
ornchurch ammer
10:49 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
£2m according to the Mail. That's going to boost the budget.
|
Lee Trundle
10:42 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
The way he pointed to his name on the back of his shirt after he scored really annoyed me for some reason.
Not really bothered about him moving on, but his goal ratio for us is surprisingly decent.
|
Takashi Miike
10:38 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
I'm not sure if people were taking the piss on his Twitter page but a few were saying "You are our best number 27 ever" 😂
|
Mad Dog
10:09 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Couldn't stand the cunt.
The way he was having a great laugh with his arsenal mates after they beat us infuriated me. I know players dont give a shit these days, but at least pretend.
Another time he was adjusting his fucking hair in the middle of an attack.
To top it all off he was shit
Good riddance.
|
Sven Roeder
10:01 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
He is worth more but we would effectively have had to subsidise his wages by selling him at a discount.
No way are they paying him the same wages as us
Huffers, Is the word that Hernandez is on his way as well?
I’m guessing he has cleared his locker & isn’t coming back.
|
ornchurch ammer
9:56 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
Bit of a clique growing was there Huffers?
I've seen mention of £4m as a fee which is a bit like giving him away. We never seem to get decent fees when selling.
|
Huffers
9:51 Tue Jun 4
Re: Lucas Perez gone
|
The Latino contingent had to be broken up.
|
| 
